Directory of Investment and Financial Articles
thefinancial.org- Privacy Policy HACKER SAFE certified sites prevent over 99.9% of hacker crime.
 
Home About Us Contact Us
Paladin: Investor Services Since 2003
     
  The more you know about investing, the more control you have over your exposure to risk and your future results.  
  All articles on this website were authored by five star rated advisors who are profiled on www.PaladinRegistry.com.  
 
Financial Services Industry
Retirement Planning
Planning for College
Financial Strategies
Special Needs
Financial Investments
Money Investing
IRAs
Retirement Plans
Tax Planning
Financial Products
The Global Economy
Alternative Investments
Choosing A Financial Advisor
Investment Advice
Financial Advisor Ethics
Business Owners
Charitable Trusts
Real Estate Investing
Search by Keyword
Keyword:  
   
Search by Author
First Name:  
 
Last Name:  
   
Who's Watching Your Money?

Who's Watching Your Money?- Jack Waymire Authored by the founder of the PaladinRegistry
Buy the book now!
 

Article: Lump Sum v Dollar Cost Averaging

Submitted by: Frank Armstrong

Frank Armstrong, is President and founder of Investor Solutions, Inc. He is a pioneer in integrating academically driven portfolio management techniques with institutional best practices for individual investors around the world. Frank has over 30 years experience in the securities and financial services industry. He holds a B.A. in Economics from the University of Virginia and is a CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNERŪ practitioner.

 

Congratulations! You won the lottery, inherited some money from a distant relative, sold your company, or rolled your pension into your IRA. You have designed an asset allocation policy that meets your unique needs, and selected your funds. Now it's time to invest the money. Should Dollar Cost Averaging be part of your strategy?

Probably not! Dollar Cost Averaging doesn't work very well if you have a lump sum to invest. Here is why. 

The market's upward bias is so strong that the odds of market prices being more favorable during any subsequent period than they are today are tilted against delay. No matter how you measure it, the market has more good periods than bad ones, and the good periods are better than the bad periods are bad. As an example, here is a look at the S&P 500 from 1926 to 2000: 

Period

Number Periods

Number Gains

Average Gains**

Number Losses

Average Losses**

Percent 
# Gains

Month

900

559

4.05

341

-3.90

62

Quarter

300

205

8.27

95

-7.58

68

Year

75

54

22.76

21

-12.17

72

2 Year*

74

62

37.41

12

-20.48

84

3 Year*

73

64

53.27

9

-24.67

88

5 Year*

71

64

90.32

7

-28.84

90

*Overlapping Periods
Percent gains and losses are not annualized

So, if we have a lump sum to invest, the odds strongly favor investing it today. Based on past history, and depending on the period we selected, we would have been right between 62 and 90 percent of the time by committing all the funds immediately rather than waiting until the end of the period for part or all of the funds. 

It may feel good (or more prudent) to delay making the commitment with all or part of your lump sum in hopes that tomorrow's prices will be more attractive. However, it has actually decreased the chances of success. Dollar Cost Averaging with a lump sum is an attempt to "split the baby" that has historically been a losing strategy. 

Especially in unsettled times, the temptation to "wait and see what happens" or other excuse to delay making a commitment to the market can be overwhelming. These delaying tactics are thinly disguised market timing strategies. 

Of course, you may have the delusional but unshakable conviction that your market timing ability will produce excess returns. This, of course, against the overwhelming evidence that shows otherwise. However, the rest of us should take the course with the highest probability of success: Invest when you have the money!

> Return to Financial Investments